“THE CRISIS IN KOREAN POLITICS TODAY” ASIA INSTITUTE REPORT

“The Crisis in Korean politics today”

Asia Institute Report

Emanuel Pastreich

 

October 13, 2017

 

 

Months of protests by a broad range of citizens groups and countless individuals, from elementary school students to seniors, resulted not only in the impeachment of a president, the launch of a serious investigation of the tragic sinking of the Sewol Ferry, serious charges brought against numerous individuals engaged in influence peddling and fraud and one of the most transparent presidential elections held in any country.

The ethical commitment of ordinary citizens in Korea has made a tremendous difference and the increasingly corrupt politics of ritual and back-room deals has been brought to the attention of the public in a manner that is both shocking and inspiring. At a time when citizens in the United States or Japan lament that they can do nothing to change their government, Korea has displayed that significant change and reform is possible. Korea not only is inspiring other nations not only through cultural productions like music and film, but also through political action and democratic vitality. Continue Reading


Pastreich introductory remarks for Daniel Garrett’s talk “Apocalypse yesterday”

Emanuel Pastreich

Director The Asia Institute

 

Emanuel Pastreich and Daniel Garrett

Emanuel Pastreich and Daniel Garrett

 

 

 

Introductory remarks to Daniel Garrett (senior associate, the Asia Institute) talk

 

“APOCALYPSE YESTERDAY: THE CLIMATE CRISIS AS THE ULTIMATE BOON FOR INNOVATION”

 

February 27, 2017

This seminar is perhaps the most important one that we have held yet at the Asia Institute and it is led by Daniel Garrett, one of the most creative, most energetic and bravest figures in American diplomacy. A man who has fought for truth, justice and the long-term interests of the United States, of Korea and frankly of all the nations of the world for many years. Daniel has been with Asia Institute for many years now and is consistently one of our most loyal and thoughtful members.
Daniel’s talk today, “Apocalypse Yesterday: The climate crisis as the ultimate boon for innovation” is a historic one in every respect. He was after all the lone diplomat in the State Department who sent out a general memo identifying climate change as the primary threat facing the United States and proposing concrete steps to respond. That act did not endear him with many of the powerful in the state department, but it was the truth and it won him respect in some very important places. He has stood up again and again for how to face the real long-term challenges.
Daniel contacted me concerning the article on climate change and security that I published in Truth Out back on March 7, 2013 (four years ago). That article, “On Climate, Defense Could Preserve and Protect, Rather Than Kill and Destroy” I proposed that the largest part of the defense spending of the United States must be committed to the adaptation to, and mitigation of, climate change. I put forward a systematic plan for how that goal might be achieved. Daniel wrote to me to offer his full support, and has been with us ever since.
By the way, the head of the Pacific Command at the time, Navy Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, visited Harvard just two days after my article came out and there met with a variety of scholars to discuss the threat of climate change. Admiral Locklear bravely identified climate change as the overwhelming threat to humanity at that time, something for which he was roundly criticized internally as well. It was the truth then, it is the truth now and no matter what dangerous and ruthless people occupy high offices, it will continue to be the truth.
There are a lot of think tanks out there in Washington D.C. or in Seoul that soak up millions of dollars and use it to promote any number of weapon systems to respond to threats that are extremely unlikely. Yet these overpaid security experts who have made fortunes catering to the needs of manufacturers who ply their outdated weapons for yesterday’s conflicts, they do not say a word about the greatest threat that humanity faces: climate change. That is right: thousands of pages about North Korean missiles but nary a word about the disaster that is killing the ocean, raising the sea levels and turning Asia into a desert.
Personally, I find such irresponsible behavior on the part of those people at those top ranked think tanks to be so offensive as to be grounds to demand that they all step down immediately. I have had it with their hypocrisy. I don’t give a damn how highly ranked their “think tanks” are. We are drawing a line in the sand.
We do not use the term “Apocalypse Yesterday” lightly. The crisis has already started yesterday. It is already an apocalypse and has been for some time. Yet stupidly, criminally, we have not even started to formulate a response.
When we start to respond, we will quickly find that there is no budget left for fancy fighter planes, or missile defense, or a lot of the other toys that these clowns who make claims about “security” like to pawn off on us. It is time for intellectuals, for professors, lawyers, politicians, military officers and journalists to stop playing stupid and make the commitment to responding to real threats. There may still be a bit we can salvage.
How much money we make from the “security” racket, how much glory we enjoy hanging out with those big players, means nothing. Success is being able to stand before God and say that you did your best.
Let us please welcome Daniel Garrett.

DANIEL H GARRETT: “Apocalyse Yesterday”

Daniel H Garrett

Senior Associate

The Asia Institute

APOCALYPSE YESTERDAY: THE CLIMATE CRISIS AS THE ULTIMATE BOON FOR INNOVATION

The Death of the Ice Fairy, The Rule of the Orange Monstrosity, and the Resistance of the Green Alliance

 

“If you want your children to be intelligent, read them fairy tales. If you want them to be more intelligent, read them more fairy tales.”

Albert Einstein

 

 

1. The Death of the Ice Fairy

 

If you want to understand the particular magic of the Good Fairy of the North Pole, it is important to recall one specific fact: the difference between specific heat, and latent heat. Specific heat is the amount of heat needed to raise one kilogram of a substance by 1 degree C. The specific heat of water is 1 kcal kg-1 which is the standard unit of heat, the calorie.  The latent heat of ice by contrast is 80 kcal kg-1.  This is an important magic to remember as polar ice disappears. Even mid-winter at the North Pole is 50 degrees above normal. As the collapse at the pole progresses and ice-free summers in the far north ensue -some 100 hundred years before the IPCC’s early predictions- we lose one of our most important climate buffers, a massive air conditioner dampening high temperatures. Furthermore, as the loss of albedo from that loss of ice further heats up the now bare, dark ocean, -amongst other things- climate chaos ensures as weather patterns that basically endured for 10,000 years are disrupted. Amongst other things, the melting permafrost releases methane, and our meager efforts to date to constrain runaway climate change, are basically undone.

It is true, there may be some scientists who give us a decade or two in which to radically reduce CO2 emissions, but at this point in time, there are probably an equal number who think we have basically waited too long, and that the arctic death spiral is exactly that: the initiation of a non-linear sequence, a climate phase change, a rapid climate change event which has the potential to essentially destroy civilization as we know it.

“Fairy tales do not tell children the dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell children the dragons can be killed.”

G.K. Chesterton

 

2. The Rule of the Orange Monstrosity

Not that there is ever a good time for a madman to take over a country, but now is probably one of the worst possible times. For not only will this disturbed person have a good chance of destroying his own personal country, but he may well also bring down the other countries of the earth with him.  The 45th President of the United States -a name that shall not be named- has Narcissistic Personality Disorder, is in fact a malignant narcissistic, and at a time when the earth’s carbon budget can no longer afford it, he has surrounded himself with climate change deniers, and oil men, and politicians bought and sold by oil men.  He and his henchmen, having been helped to this position of power by fear and prejudice-driven manipulations of a superstitious and undereducated populace, in combination with well-done assistance from the Russian Federation, will (amongst other odious acts) probably seek to remove sanctions on Russia so as to fulfill a lucrative ($500 billion dollar) contract to develop the oil and gas reserves of the Russian Arctic.

The Russian Federation it can be presumed is doing this for regime survival (perhaps also thinking geoengineeering is safe and inexpensive), while the U.S., as is typical of much of its so-called leadership is doing it for short-sighted gains (money) and an obsolete understanding of what makes for national power.

And meanwhile, though the Ice Fairy of the North is dying, no one except those who have studied her, seem to understand that her death means calamity for all of us.  Wild weather and unpredictability are already with us, while we remain largely transfixed and preoccupied with trivia, instead of rising to the level of actually confronting this planetary crisis. And what is equally tragic, her sister, the Ice Fairy of the south is crumbling, far faster than anyone had predicted, or almost anyone, and so, if you live near the coast, or love one of the many great cities of the planet that are on or near the coast, it really is time you think of moving.

 

“If you ever find yourself in the wrong story, leave.”

Mo Willems, Goldilocks and the Three Dinosaurs

 

3. The Resistance of the Great Green Alliance

 

So let us be clear.  The Paris Agreement, as Hansen said, is bullshit.  And unless we want to devolve into warring states, throwing up our borders as best we can to stop the desperate waves of climate change refugees who really have nowhere else to go, those of use who are still somewhat sane, and those nation states which understand that only a massive, quick, collective effort involving real cash, and real innovation, is the only way to save as many as possible, and pave the way to a truly human way of living on this planet, must act together.  We must form in fact, a Great Green Alliance, one that holds accountable any individual, company, or country, which holds itself above the need for collective survival.

Those who have worked to warn about the dangers of climate change over the decades will remember the time, not that long ago, when they refused, or were reluctant to even talk about adaptation, for fear it would take the focus away from the urgent necessity of mitigation.  As action was not forthcoming, this gave way to an understanding that some talk of adaptation was going to be necessary. Now it appears that we have waited too long and the momentum already built up in the earth system, and the fact that largely un-modeled positive feedbacks and black swan events meant that Earth System Sensitivity was at the high-end of the imagined range, we are rapidly swinging into a full-fledged global abrupt climate change event.  Mitigation of course must go on in the hopes of preventing various forms of essentially irreversible runaway climate change, but the level and type of adaptation required is of a whole new order of magnitude.

By way of reference consider the PETM event.  Carbon was emitted during the PETM event at a rate of about 6.2 billion tons of CO2 per year, and about 1.1 billion tons of methane per year.  The current emission rate of CO2 from humans is about 30.6 billion tons of CO2 per years, and about 1.1 billion tons of methane per year. In other words we are emitting CO2 at about five times faster than the PETM, and about 27 times its methane emission rate.  We are in uncharted waters, and it is hot and moreover acidic.

4. Some Policy Recommendations for the Great Green Alliance

1) Legal and trade defenses against individual, companies and nations which are not adopting emergency rates of decarbonization (we need teeth).

2) Heavy national and transnational taxes on extreme wealth with proceeds transferred to the global poor (6 individuals have as much wealth as the bottom half of humanity; moreover for this rapid survival transition to be possible, if levels of inequality remain as they are, civil disturbance will be so great as to disrupt all well-laid plans).

3) Most known geoengineering schemes are known to be dangerous.  Solar shielding the arctic and Antarctic regions though expensive might be worth considering. Other possibilities that evaluations so-far do not appear to have eliminated from consideration are converting 9% of the ocean’s surface to seaweed farming, and radical afforestation schemes involving water-from air technology assistance or of course some combination thereof.

4. Innovative drop-in climate change lifeboats which provide self-sustaining  systems of water, energy and food for the global south where possible.

5. Rapid development of smart-skins for the global south (and elsewhere). In other words, instead of trying to air condition everything, simply provide smart-skins to individuals which locally regulate temperature and allow life to continue in the new climate regime.

6. Massive programs of emergency vertical farm construction for cities as the new chaotic weather regime makes traditional farming extremely difficult and undependable.

7. Careful planning for orderly relocation from the coasts so as to avoid chaos and mass civil disturbance.

 

 

References

 

1.”The Arctic is the First and Possibly Last Defense Against a Climate Transition to an Uninhabitable Earth” D. H. Garrett, Truthout, December 2013 http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/20463-the-arctic-is-the-first-and-possibly-last-line-of-defense-against-a-climate-transition-to-an-uninhabitable-earth

 

2. “A Farewell to Ice: A Report from the Arctic” Peter Wadhams, Penguin Books Ltd (2016)

 

  1. Reconciled climate response estimates from climate models and the energy budget of Earth”Mark Richardson, Kevin Cowtan, Ed Hawkins & Martin B. Stolpe Nature Climate Change 6, 931–935 (2016) doi:10.1038/nclimate3066Received 17 November 2015 Accepted 27 May 2016 Published online 27 June 2016

 

4. “Climate science bedeviled by ‘tipping points’”January 19, 2017 by Marlowe Hoodhttps://phys.org/news/2017-01-climate-science-bedeviled.html

 

5. Evidence for a rapid release of carbon at the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum James D. Wrighta,1 and Morgan F. Schallera,b Edited* by Wallace S. Broecker, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, and approved August 5, 2013 (received for review May 14, 2013) PNAS

 

6. Reply to Pearson and Nicholas, Stassen et al., and Zeebe et al.: Teasing out the missing piece of the PETM puzzle

James D. Wright and Morgan F. Schallera

Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25; 111(12): E1068–E1071.

Published online 2014 Feb 26. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1321876111

 

7. CO2 Currently Rising Faster Than The PETM Extinction Event

Posted on 17 June 2011 by Rob Paintinhttps://skepticalscience.com/co2-rising-ten-times-faster-than-petm-extinction.html

 

8. “North Pole Temperatures May Soar to 50 Degrees Above Normal Freakishly warm pole weather is likely to peak on Christmas Eve” By Brian Kahn on December 21, 2016, Scientific American

 

  • 9. “Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming” Tobias Friedrich Axel Timmermann, Michelle Tigchelaar, Oliver Elison Timm and Andrey GanopolskiScience Advances  09 Nov 2016:

Vol. 2, no. 11, e1501923

 

10. Lloyd’s: Emerging Risk Report: 2015: Innovation Series: Food System Shock http://www.lloyds.com/~/media/files/news%20and%20insight/risk%20insight/2015/food%20system%20shock/food%20system%20shock_june%202015.pdf

 

11. “Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario” David P. Keller, Ellias Y. Feng & Andreas Oschlies, Nature Communications 5, 2015

 

 

Coda:

 

 

transpolar

 

over the pole

in its death spiral

of disappearing ice

 

I still feel the clutched

embrace of my little son

crying daddy daddy

wanting no one else

to hold him

as if he knew I was leaving today

 

do I grieve for him

grieve for myself

grieve for the earth

we are leaving him

 

or is it all

premature

will love somehow

find a way to save

the beauty and the child

 

my heart still aches

with the warmth and trust

of his hug

but the climate is changing

12000 years of calm sedateness

are out the window now

and the storms walking boldly

amongst us

are not so easily

tamed

 

 

 

 


Asia Institute Report on North Korean Defectors in South Korea by Jung-Hwan Jang

This detailed investigation by Asia Institute’s intern Jung-Hwan Jang of the actual experiences of North Korean defectors in South Korean society gives a balanced view of the shifting nature of the defector’s saga.

 

 

Examining Diversity in the Republic of Korea Through the Educational Lens

The experiences of North Korean defectors: Do specialized schools aimed at North Korean defectors rather hinder their transition into South Korean society than help them?

 

PDF version

The Diversity in R.O.K. Education Project_Jang_Junghwan

 

 

 


“Stop Climate Change” pins from the Asia Institute

As part of our push to raise awareness of the challenge of climate change, the Asia Institute has released “Stop Climate Change” pins that all members should wear to encourage people to take action. Please purchase one for 3000 Won by contacting me, or our secretary Ahn Sewon angelico.asw@gmail.com). They will also be available at our seminars.

 

Thanks for your support

climate change