“Is Northeast Asia the source of the climate crisis, or the solution?”
The Asia Institute
New York University Shanghai
Thursday, October 19, 2017
New York University Shanghai
Northeast Asia has undergone a tremendous transformation over the last fifty years which is still heralded as an economic miracle. But the devastating impact of climate change suggests that a far different narrative will emerge in the years ahead. Many are concerned that the awareness of climate change remains low in the region and that reliance on smokestack industries and a consumption culture will have serious impact.
But there are signs that China is moving more quickly to address the environmental crisis than any other country in the world, and because of the scale of China’s economy, the impact will be considerable. Similar, if less ambitious, efforts are being made in Korea and Japan.
Moreover, China, Japan and Korea have a tremendous tradition of sophisticated organic farming and recycling which offers our future some hope. The American professor F. H. King detailed Asia’s achievements in his book Farmers of Forty Centuries back in 1909, suggesting that the West should learn from China. Sadly, the opposite has taken place.
New York University Shanghai
Asia Institute Seminar:
New Possibilities for exchange between Korea and Japan
Sunday March 28
Gwanghwamun, Seoul, Korea
Two young Japanese known for their advocacy for peace in Asia, Kawanaka Yo & Hara Hiroyuki, will be available to talk to you about new potential approaches to cooperation so that we can move forward in a positive direction. Please do join us at the Koreana Hotel Paul Bassett.
Asia Institute Seminar
Saturday, June 17, 2017
“India’s Strategic Interests in East Asia”
The Asia Institute
Asia Institute Chungmuro Office
24, Chungmuro 11-gil Jung-gu Seoul, Korea
(see map below)
중구충무로 11길 24번지 8층
India has taken a deeper interest in East Asia as it strives to define its new global role. This seminar will consider what India is looking for, who are the different parties competing to define India’s strategy and what are the prospects for the future.
Although India’s engagement with East Asia dates back to thousands of years, much of the developments in the realm of the business and strategic relations developed in the post-1990s to project itself as a regional power when it opened its market and launched its “Look East Policy”. Under this policy, it initiated forging several economic and commercial ties and also enhanced security partnerships with like-minded countries who are concerned with the increasing influence of China in the region. In the early years, the Look East Policy was primarily focused on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). India has since expanded the geographic domain of its policy to include Korea, Japan, China, and Australia.
As the power balance is moving from the western hemisphere to Asia-pacific region wherein the rise of China and the US’s pivot to Asia define the foreign policy debate in many countries, New Delhi has also crafted its foreign policy to stay abreast. The Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi led government soon after its emphatic victory in 2014 re-crafted the India’s “Look East Policy” to “Act East Policy” wherein it has sought to actively engage the Asian partners both from the economic as well as security perspective.
This can be gauged by the fact that Asia has become one of the most focused areas of the present government. The Modi government has forged and revitalized several strategic partnerships and also tried to put impetus in the existing partnerships with countries which had lost its sheen due to India’s own policy paralysis in the last few years. The strategic interest is not only confined to military but it also includes economic interests. India is the second biggest market with its rapidly ballooning middle class wherein most of the Asian tigers including Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Japan, and many others have huge strategic interests in the world’s fastest growing economy.
May 14, 2017
Asia Institute’s Korea Peace Movement holds March for Peace in downtown Korea.
The Asia Institute brought together a group of concerned citizens from around the world on May 14 for a march for peace in the face of increasing tensions around the world. Dr. Lakhvinder Singh, director of the Korea Peace Movement, called for an active movement to “wage peace.” He was joined by Lee Raekyong, president of the think tank The Tomorrow, who called for all citizens to recognize the dangers of militarism. Activist Lee Eumsim then read a poem calling for peace. Finally, Kawanaka Yo, a peace activist who came all the way from Japan, performed a dance for peace. The group then conducted a march to city hall and back, appealing to ordinary citizens to join our cause.
Dr. Singh’s editorial in the Korea Times:
May 12, 2017
By Lakhvinder Singh
If others actively wage war, we must actively “Wage Peace.”
Today, facing growing violence in our society and around the world, there is an urgent need to show that the true bravery needed to counter conflict takes the form, as Mahatma Gandhi said, of “waging peace.” We cannot counter violence with more violence.
We must realize that to build a peaceful society we must build peace at all levels: individual, societal, national and global.
The first level for waging peace is building peace “within,” between man and his creator. The establishment of true harmony between man and nature is the fundamental requirement for any peaceful society.
The second level of peace-building is the creation of peace between the members of the family. Our materialistic attitude toward our surroundings, and toward each other, has created unlimited desires that are tearing our families apart.
The third level of peace-building is the creation of peace and harmony between the members of our society so that they feel unity and a common cause. Thoughtless consumption and materialism has created terrible alienation that leaves us all isolated and lonely.
The fourth level of the peace movement is to bring peace to the international community by establishing a new consensus about our priorities. Most countries are pushing for their selfish interests without concern for the needs of other countries, for the common good or even for their own future.
In order to be certain that our efforts are sustainable and we create a true culture of peace we must establish peace at all four levels. Peace between man and his creator, between family members and society, and between nations, are closely interrelated and interdependent. Peace at one level cannot exist without peace at other level.
We must come together and address all the intricacies of this complicated problem of peace-building. We urgently need to engage all members of society around the world to create a true culture for peace that is unstoppable.
With the election of Moon Jae-in as president of Korea a new ray of peace of has appeared on the Korean Peninsula. Let his message of harmony and reconciliation bring peace not only to the Korean Peninsula, but to the whole world. Let us pray for his success and march for peace on May 14 in downtown Seoul.
We will be there. Will you?
WCO & the Asia Institute
European Chamber of Commerce in Korea
Dongho-ro 17-gil (Dasan-dong 252-6) Jung-gu, Seoul
중구 동호로 17길 (다산동 252-6)
Europe has increasingly become an important partner for Korea and European interest in East Asia is growing rapidly. But what exactly does Korea mean for Europeans, in an economic or a political sense? Christoph Heider, President of the European Chamber of Commerce in Korea, presents his insights into the growing significance of Korea’s European ties and the factors that underlie efforts by Europe to engage Korea and seek out new partnerships.
Christoph Heider, President of the European Chamber of Commerce in Korea, joined the chamber in 2013. He was the former Chief Financial Officer for Bayer Korea Ltd. in Seoul and Regional Manager of Bayer AG’s Legal Entity Accounting for Asia Pacific in Germany. Heider had worked for Bayer Ltd. in Tokyo from 1997 to 2005 having arrived in Japan as a teacher shortly before.
Heider graduated with an Intermediate Diploma in Economics from the Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany in 1988 before going on to complete his Diploma in Business Economics from the University of Mannheim in 1991. He then went on to finish a Postgraduate Program in Japanese from the University of Tuebingen in Germany and Doshisha University in Japan in 1996.